humanitarian relief

if i'm just a walking sac
of chemicals, then there's no
such thing as miracles
and caring isn't caring; just synapses
flaring—so tell me, why should i care?

movies end happily, but i can't

for the life of me understand—if
God is dead,
what’s the hurry? why all
this cumbersome worry?
there's no referent and nothing
is definite; so do as you please; forget
poverty, education, disease.

please
tell me why—why
i should care; 
pack my bags and go
over there; pay
plane, bus and taxi
fare? so what
if children don't
eat and people can't
walk down the street without
rape, AIDS, pregnancy to meet?

i get the green thing. i have to live
in this space with all the rest
of this evolving race. but there's no
Telos so Darwin tells us—so why
should i care?

‘cause apparently, we ain't
goin' nowhere.

so i decided i don't care. but
i can't. i mean, just listen
to this rant. there's
care there.
care's there from the start,
presupposing
Science and Art; care
recessed, repressed in
my blood-rent heart.

things aren't
the way they're
supposed to be,
and the Story
of Biology is not
sufficient—they say we're
here on accident but
i need more.

i need more in order
to account
for this life as we live
it. look around and see
people caring, friend and neighbor
sharing—poverty, injustice repairing.
there's care there.

people don't love wholly
right, even when striving with all
our light: we withhold, we
withdraw, we fight; we harbor
anger, we brandish pride; we've all
of us murdered and lied; selfishly denied
truth, justice, mercy.

and yet
there's Care there.
Care echoes
in our tomes, re-
calling
to our breath
and bones
our Original
Shimmering
Start—pulsating,
all along,
in our heart.

(c) Renea McKenzie, 2014

The line breaks have been reworked since this poem's original publishing at Probe.org (which for some reason is still published under wrong title; the title was never "humanitarian aid"). At any rate, the new line breaks (I hope) add layers of meaning and emphasis.

Thinking through... Summer Blockbusters

I love movies. It's summer, so if you're like me, you've seen so many movies recently it's too hard to remember exactly how many you've seen. Did you know that over the last ten years or so, Hollywood puts out an average of six hundred movies each year. That's almost two movies a day (many, many more if you include Bollywood)! Movies are everywhere, and on that level alone they are important to think about and discuss in our Christian communities as we try to help one another live more like Christ.

But movies aren't only important because they're prevalent. Movies are important because they communicate ideas about what is true. We've always used art as a way of expressing our beliefs about and experiences of reality: what is true about life and what it means to be a person, why is there evil and how can we be saved from it... "Man has always and will continue to express his hope and excitement, as well as his fears and reservations, about life and what it means to be human through the arts. He will seek to express his world through any and all available mediums, and presently that includes film."1

"KHAAANNNN!"

So movies are important not just because they're everywhere, but because they tell us about life and what it means to be human. Normally, in church, when we talk about where our ideas about life and what it means to be a person and how we should live, where do we say those ideas come from? Right, the Bible.

And that's true! But God has given us art too. And we need art and science and nature and each other and the Bible to interpret what is real, what is true. We need all of these things together to help us make sense of life; because sometimes life is a mess. When your friend betrays you and you don't know why. When your parents divorce. When you lose your job. When life isn't bad just uncertain, or confusing... or complicated because two guys like you at the same time or you're not exactly sure which career path to pursue...

I have to thank my friend and colleague Todd Kappelman, professor of philosophy at Dallas Baptist University. I'll be pulling a lot from his lecture "Perspectives on Film: What's in a movie?" Todd notes: "A film is able to convey an enormous range of human experience and emotions. A good filmmaker, script writer, director, producer, or actor can take us to places that we might never be able to see through our everyday experiences." Can you think of some examples? Star Trek. The Hobbit. Even movies like Saving Private Ryan or Braveheart. 

And because movies are able to involve us in situations that are outside of our everyday experiences, but that we can relate to, "[movies] may also show us things about our world that would otherwise remain hidden to the untrained eye." For example, Wall-E. For those of you haven't seen Wall-E, basically humanity destroys all oxygen-producing plant life and has to ship civilization out into outer space. Everyone's on a giant cruise ship in space, lounging in these mobile recliners that take them wherever they want to go and they have these screens that pop up and they can order whatever food they want, and it comes right to them. And they've been living like this in space for years so everyone is super fat. There are a couple of underlying messages in this movie; they're pretty obvious, right? Take care of the Earth our home and discipline yourself in this world of modern convenience. But because these messages are communicated to us, not directly in the world in which we live, but indirectly through a world with robots and space cruise ships, it's a message that's easier to swallow.

The underlying messages of Wall-E are pretty obvious; however, many movies have messages which are much more subtle. And unless we know what to look for and how to look for it we will miss it. We will miss what the movie is really saying behind the special effects and witty dialogue. Often movies communicate ideas about life and reality through symbols; it's like code. The movies don't often just come out waving robot arms saying: "This is the message about life from this movie." So we need to learn how to interpret the code.

Movies have ideas and those ideas come from the women and men who make them. Duh. Right, I know. But we don't always think about it. Every person has a worldview and that worldview is always in a person's art.

My colleague Todd gives us five basic questions to ask when watching movies:

1. How important is life to the director/writers, etc? Are tough issues dealt with or avoided? "Christian" movies come to mind when I think of this question. Sometimes these movies are really bad about candy-coating life--everything ends nice and neatly and all the bad stuff about life is kind of skipped over or neatly dealt with. This is a disservice because it isn't true to life.
2. Is there a discernible philosophical position in the film? If so, what is it, and can a case be made for your interpretation? How many of you saw Avatar? I saw it twice. It was awesome in 3D. For a long time now, Hollywood's favorite and most popular worldview has been pantheism.
3. Is the subject matter of the film portrayed truthfully? Here the goal is to determine if the subject matter is being dealt with in a way that is in agreement with or contrary to the experiences of daily reality. Let me think here... what comes to mind? Um... romantic comedies. Don't get me wrong, I like many romantic comedies, but I also go to those movies with my brain turned on. And it's important we do that because those movies aren't just fun-loving and warm-fuzzy, they also communicate ideas about romance and marriage and dating and sex. And if we go into these movies with our brains turned off, we will begin to subconsciously absorb these false ideas. If I'm not filtering the film with biblical discernment, I can easily begin to expect my love life to be like the movies, which when I say it out loud like that sounds ridiculous. But it happens in subtle ways and more often than we think.
4. Is there a discernible hostility toward particular values and beliefs? Does the film seek to be offensive for the sake of sensationalism alone? I think a case can be made that The DaVinci Code fits into this category. But you know, hostility toward Christianity is all over, not just movies, but TV too. When Christians are portrayed on the show Criminal Minds for example, they're often extreme fundamentalists who hate gays and repress women. And you know, that's a legitimate complaint against some who call themselves Christians. But when those are the only types of Christians shown time and time again on TV and in the movies, the whole picture isn't being shown. It's being distorted.
5. Is the film technically well made, written, produced and acted? I confess, Despicable Me 2 was a major disappointment. It was technically well done; I mean, the animation was awesome. But the writing and the plot... boring, really rather unoriginal. Such a let down because the first one was so good!

Now as Christian interpreters, we have three more questions to ask ourselves:

1. Does the interpretation of reality in this work conform to or fail to conform to Christian doctrine or ethics? Sometimes a movie will match up pretty solidly with the Creation-Fall-Redemption narrative of Scripture. Sometimes a movie will represent the complete opposite ideas about what life is like and what it means to be human. But most of the time, movies present to us ideas that partly conform to Christian doctrine or ethics. Because movies come out of the ideas in the heart and minds of the women and men who create them, and Romans 2 tells us that God has written his truth on the hearts of all people.
2. If some of the ideas and values are Christian, are they inclusively or exclusively Christian? That is, do these ideas encompass Christianity and other religions or philosophic viewpoints, or do they exclude Christianity from other viewpoints? The case could be made that The Book of Eli presents Christian values in an inclusive way. It's subtle, and if you blinked you might have missed it. The movie isn't about preserving the Word of God. It's about preserving the religious books of the world. And it is no mistake that the Bible was placed right next to the Koran in the library at the end.
3. If some of the ideas and values in a work are Christian, are they a relatively complete version of the Christian view, or are they a relatively rudimentary version of Christian belief on a given topic? (Like Criminal Minds.)

Finally, a few cautions:

1. Just because a movie depicts unChristian ethics or values doesn't mean it's bad art. Likewise, just because a movie depicts Christian values doesn't mean it's good art.
2. Be careful not to allow your personal perspective to dominate the description of a particular work. Try to understand as many other perspectives as you can.
3. Do not expect a non-Christian to agree with you, arrive at the same conclusions, or completely understand your perspective. At best we can hope to offer a clear and coherent insight into a work and thereby gain an opportunity for a Christian voice to be heard.

Okay. So movies are important. And so is the need for Christian interpretation. If we don't turn on our brains, we will unknowingly begin to believe untruths about life and what it means to be human. Movies are also important because they provide a good, nonthreatening way to talk about truth and worldview---ideas about life and what it means to be human---with our friends and coworkers. So if you like movies as much as I do, I hope you will go to the movies and keep your brain turned.

______________________________________________________________

1. Kappleman, Todd, "15 Perspectives on Film: What's in a Movie?"

Christianity vs. Postmodernism

I've been asked to explain why Postmodernism is not in conflict with Christianity - I am more than happy to oblige.

I must start by addressing the issue of postmodernism as a worldview. In my previous posts about this, I have been discussing the philosophical approach known as postmodernism in which we examine our world by questioning absolutes. However, some have developed an entire worldview that denies absolutes - they are taking the postmodern philosophy out of its intended context and using it almost like a religion. (Phrases like, "I don't believe in God/Buddha/Heaven because I am a postmodernist" should not make sense.) This abuse of philosophy goes by the name "postmodernism" and obviously stands in opposition to Christianity; so, when I said that the two could be reconciled I was not talking about this type of postmodernism.

(If you find that last paragraph confusing then take heart - you are on the right track. It is very frustrating that there are TWO things called postmodernism that are not exactly the same; things like this make my life difficult. Who allowed someone to name a worldview postmodernism? Isn't there a consortium of philosophers watching out for this sort of thing?)

So, the approach that we call postmodernism (the one I have been talking about for a few weeks) teaches us not to accept absolutes and truths at face value. This approach causes us to question everything.

Don't think of it as a bad thing. A person of this nature will question the Lordship of Christ and the authority of scripture - but they will also question the philosophy of Nihilsm and modern claims of religious plurality. A non-postmodernist is the type who believes in whatever they hear without giving it any thought and that is very dangerous. Also, since we do not live in the middle ages we should not expect our churches to "strongarm" people into going to church - it's always OK for believers to ask questions.

Remember this?

Test everything.
Hold on to the good.
Avoid every kind of evil.

-1 Thessalonians 5:21-22

I'm not trying to be so audacious as to say that the Bible teaches postmodernism. But, notice that the believer is expected to ask questions about everything. When Thomas claimed that he would not believe in The Resurrection until he touched Jesus' body, he didn't have to wait long before Jesus showed up and invited him to touch his flesh. (This doesn't make him a bad person. Remember, the other apostles weren't too quick to catch on when the ladies arrived to tell them Jesus had risen.)

If postmodernism is a method of learning the truth then it can only point to what is absolutely true. The difficulty comes when we think postmodernism teaches us to deny absolutes - it does not. It specifically teaches us to be incredulous to them - which means that we can come to believe in those absolutes if our observations confirm them. Was there ever an actual believer who did not initially question the truths of the Bible - only to accept them in the end?